BazaarLink
Operated by 集聯科技有限公司
3 model routes currently listed at zero price.
https://api.bazaarlink.ai/v1Models mentioned
qwen/qwen3.7-flash:freedeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731free:freeauto:freeEquivalent paid value
How this was valued: Loose modeled admission-only bound, NOT the deliverable daily free allowance: the no-credit 10RPM ceiling bounds at most 14400 calls/day before the additional 60 weighted-unit budget. Exact unit weights are unpublished and likely make actual throughput far smaller. The free product page and same-name paid catalog row identify Deepseek V4 Flash 0731free, with 1048576 context; the output ceiling is modeled from the exact released DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 marketplace specification. Its own paid alias costs $0.20/M input and $0.40/M output. Saturate output then fill remaining context. Shared quotas are not additive. Assumes uninterrupted successful saturation with no concurrency, capacity, availability or latency loss. This is a theoretical workload equivalent, not a cash credit or observed account allowance.
Daily weighted-unit costs cannot be converted to tokens; the loose RPM envelope deliberately omits that unknown lower ceiling and is not a guaranteed free-value estimate. The malformed release alias also needs runtime identity confirmation.
Limits and terms
- Requests Per Minute
- 10
- Requests Per Minute With Credit
- 20
- Daily Quota Units
- 60
- Daily Quota Units With Credit
- 120
- Global Requests Per Minute
- 15
- Concurrent Requests
- 2
- Reset
- Daily quota resets at 00:00 UTC; RPM uses a rolling 60-second window.
- Request Quota Cost
- Weighted units are shared across all free models and can grow with input length; the daily number is not an unconditional request count.
- Paid Fallback
- Paid fallback applies only when enabled and the account has sufficient balance. Disable it with X-Free-Fallback=false to avoid paid fallback.
What happens to your prompts?
Prompt TTL, route-specific training, product-improvement scope, and upstream handling remain unresolved.
- Plan Scope
- BazaarLink gateway and free API routes.
- Prompt Retention
- The public agreements were located, but no clear API prompt-content TTL was verified.
- Response Retention
- not documented
- Ordinary Logging
- Account, usage, security, and service data may be collected; content/metadata separation is not clearly documented.
- Model Training
- No route-specific no-training guarantee was found for all free models.
- Product Improvement
- General improvement uses are permitted without a precise API-content scope.
- Human Or Operator Access
- not documented
- Subprocessors And Routing
- The gateway routes requests to model providers; upstream terms can apply independently.
- Deletion Controls
- General privacy requests exist, but no per-request or upstream deletion guarantee was found.
- Caveat
- A legal policy exists, but it does not resolve the central inference-data questions for the free gateway.
Governing documents
- Terms Of Service
- https://bazaarlink.ai/terms
- Privacy Policy
- https://bazaarlink.ai/privacy
Eligibility
- Account Required
- Yes
- Payment Method Required
- No
Primary sources
Before you build with BazaarLink
Read the classification narrowly
This record has current first-party evidence for some zero-cost hosted inference. The label describes the bounded offer supported by evidence on 2026-10-06; it does not guarantee permanence, production suitability, uptime, latency, model quality, or access from every region.
Resolve the live model route
This snapshot records 3 model IDs. Match the exact ID against the provider's live catalog before using it in code; zero-price routes and aliases can rotate while an older documentation page remains online. The recorded base endpoint is https://api.bazaarlink.ai/v1, but the provider's current API reference remains authoritative for paths, authentication, and request shape.
Confirm account and billing boundaries
An account is required, so public catalog evidence cannot by itself prove the limits, balance, or billing behavior attached to your workspace. The reviewed evidence explicitly says no payment card is required. Re-check the signup flow because eligibility and billing controls can change after the snapshot. The equivalent paid value shown here prices a documented allowance where possible; it is not cash, guaranteed savings, or protection from overage.
Re-read the prompt policy for your plan
This record classifies the reviewed handling as “Partially private”: Prompt TTL, route-specific training, product-improvement scope, and upstream handling remain unresolved. Provider policies can distinguish free, paid, enterprise, opted-in, and feature-specific traffic, so verify the governing terms for the exact account and route that will receive your data.
Follow the evidence, then re-check it
The record links 10 first-party sources covering the offer, catalog, limits, pricing, terms, privacy, or adoption evidence available to the audit. Prefer the newest governing document or live catalog when sources disagree, and submit a correction when a provider changes a material term.
Match the quota to the workload shape
Translate the published allowance into the traffic pattern you actually expect instead of comparing headline totals alone. A daily token pool can look generous while a low requests-per-minute or concurrency ceiling blocks interactive bursts; a high request limit can still fail a long-context job when input, output, or per-request tokens are capped. Separate prompt tokens from generated tokens, include retries and tool calls, and test the largest realistic payload. If the provider documents more than one limit window, the tightest window at your peak load is the practical ceiling. Research, experimental, and community access can also carry eligibility or fair-use constraints that cannot be modeled as a simple number.
Plan fallback without changing the rules
A fallback should preserve more than API syntax. Confirm that the substitute route supports the required modality, context length, streaming behavior, structured output, tools, and safety controls, then compare its prompt-retention and training terms. An OpenAI-compatible request shape does not make providers operationally or contractually equivalent. Decide which errors may trigger a retry, cap retry storms, and prevent an exhausted free route from silently switching to a billable model. If deterministic output matters, record the model revision and sampling settings; rotating aliases and free-model pools can change behavior even when the endpoint remains available.
Monitor the offer as a dependency
Capture the model ID, response model field, rate-limit headers, usage fields, latency, HTTP status, and any provider request identifier for each test. Watch for authorization failures, quota exhaustion, catalog removal, policy revisions, and dashboard balance changes as separate failure modes. Re-check the provider’s live catalog and governing pages on a schedule proportionate to the workload’s importance, and keep the dated sources that supported your decision. Free capacity is especially suitable for prototypes, evaluations, fallbacks, and bounded workloads when the application can tolerate change; a production dependency still needs observability, an exit path, and an owner responsible for re-verification.
Test one complete request before scaling
Start with the smallest permitted request using the exact credential, model ID, endpoint, and account type you intend to deploy. Record the HTTP status, response headers, usage fields, latency, and any dashboard balance change. Then exercise the failure path: an invalid model, an exhausted quota, or a rate-limit response should fail clearly without silently switching to a paid route. If the provider supports streaming or tool calls, validate those features separately because a free model can expose a narrower capability set than its paid counterpart. Keep a budget ceiling outside the application whenever billing is possible, and avoid sending sensitive data until the observed route matches the reviewed data agreement.