Fikra API
A possible free offer exists, but a decisive term still needs verification.
https://api.fikraapi.co.ke/v1Models mentioned
fikra-flashfikra-fast-8bfikra-pro-20bfikra-pro-120bfikra-qwen-maxfikra-autofikra-auto-profikra-codernot_currently_documentedLimits and terms
- Signup Tokens
- not currently documented
- Recurrence
- No
- Requests Per Minute
- 30
- Exhausted Behavior
- HTTP 402 until top-up.
- Caveat
- Current quickstart and billing describe funded PAYG without the former 300k signup allowance. The limits page still references a free sandbox, but authenticated current quota and callable test-key availability need verification; indexed and directly rendered documentation also disagree on limits and pricing.
What happens to your prompts?
- Plan Scope
- Fikra API; legal pages still name Lacesse Ventures while the current product footer names Roniki Systems. Groq and Alibaba routes now appear in model documentation.
- Prompt Retention
- The privacy policy states prompts are processed in memory and immediately discarded under a strict zero-data-retention policy.
- Response Retention
- Responses are also stated not to be stored or logged and are immediately discarded.
- Ordinary Logging
- Request metadata (timestamps, token counts, and model) is logged for billing; prompts and responses are excluded.
- Model Training
- Fikra states it does not train on prompts or responses.
- Product Improvement
- No content-based improvement use is disclosed.
- Human Or Operator Access
- No ordinary stored-content access is available under the stated design; transient processing by Fikra and Groq remains necessary.
- Subprocessors And Routing
- The privacy page names Groq, Render, HostAfrica, Cloudflare, Supabase, and payment providers, while current model docs also advertise Alibaba Qwen. That additional upstream's end-to-end policy is not covered clearly by the older legal page.
- Deletion Controls
- Content is claimed to be discarded immediately; account/privacy requests remain available for other personal data.
- Caveat
- The legal operator and upstream list conflict with the current product/model pages. Preserve the published gateway ZDR claim, but do not assume it establishes current end-to-end Alibaba routing protections; free sandbox eligibility also needs verification.
Governing documents
- Terms Of Service
- https://fikraapi.co.ke/terms
- Privacy Policy
- https://fikraapi.co.ke/privacy
Eligibility
- Account Required
- Yes
- Payment Method Required
- No
Primary sources
Before you build with Fikra API
Read the classification narrowly
This offer is not counted as verified because a material detail remains unresolved. The label describes the bounded offer supported by evidence on 2026-10-06; it does not guarantee permanence, production suitability, uptime, latency, model quality, or access from every region.
Resolve the live model route
This snapshot records 9 model IDs. Match the exact ID against the provider's live catalog before using it in code; zero-price routes and aliases can rotate while an older documentation page remains online. The recorded base endpoint is https://api.fikraapi.co.ke/v1, but the provider's current API reference remains authoritative for paths, authentication, and request shape.
Confirm account and billing boundaries
An account is required, so public catalog evidence cannot by itself prove the limits, balance, or billing behavior attached to your workspace. The reviewed evidence explicitly says no payment card is required. Re-check the signup flow because eligibility and billing controls can change after the snapshot. The equivalent paid value shown here prices a documented allowance where possible; it is not cash, guaranteed savings, or protection from overage.
Re-read the prompt policy for your plan
This record classifies the reviewed handling as “Partially private”: Privacy protections are incomplete, conditional, or not fully documented. Provider policies can distinguish free, paid, enterprise, opted-in, and feature-specific traffic, so verify the governing terms for the exact account and route that will receive your data.
Follow the evidence, then re-check it
The record links 8 first-party sources covering the offer, catalog, limits, pricing, terms, privacy, or adoption evidence available to the audit. Prefer the newest governing document or live catalog when sources disagree, and submit a correction when a provider changes a material term.
Match the quota to the workload shape
Translate the published allowance into the traffic pattern you actually expect instead of comparing headline totals alone. A daily token pool can look generous while a low requests-per-minute or concurrency ceiling blocks interactive bursts; a high request limit can still fail a long-context job when input, output, or per-request tokens are capped. Separate prompt tokens from generated tokens, include retries and tool calls, and test the largest realistic payload. If the provider documents more than one limit window, the tightest window at your peak load is the practical ceiling. Research, experimental, and community access can also carry eligibility or fair-use constraints that cannot be modeled as a simple number.
Plan fallback without changing the rules
A fallback should preserve more than API syntax. Confirm that the substitute route supports the required modality, context length, streaming behavior, structured output, tools, and safety controls, then compare its prompt-retention and training terms. An OpenAI-compatible request shape does not make providers operationally or contractually equivalent. Decide which errors may trigger a retry, cap retry storms, and prevent an exhausted free route from silently switching to a billable model. If deterministic output matters, record the model revision and sampling settings; rotating aliases and free-model pools can change behavior even when the endpoint remains available.
Monitor the offer as a dependency
Capture the model ID, response model field, rate-limit headers, usage fields, latency, HTTP status, and any provider request identifier for each test. Watch for authorization failures, quota exhaustion, catalog removal, policy revisions, and dashboard balance changes as separate failure modes. Re-check the provider’s live catalog and governing pages on a schedule proportionate to the workload’s importance, and keep the dated sources that supported your decision. Free capacity is especially suitable for prototypes, evaluations, fallbacks, and bounded workloads when the application can tolerate change; a production dependency still needs observability, an exit path, and an owner responsible for re-verification.
Test one complete request before scaling
Start with the smallest permitted request using the exact credential, model ID, endpoint, and account type you intend to deploy. Record the HTTP status, response headers, usage fields, latency, and any dashboard balance change. Then exercise the failure path: an invalid model, an exhausted quota, or a rate-limit response should fail clearly without silently switching to a paid route. If the provider supports streaming or tool calls, validate those features separately because a free model can expose a narrower capability set than its paid counterpart. Keep a budget ceiling outside the application whenever billing is possible, and avoid sending sensitive data until the observed route matches the reviewed data agreement.